Today, the 22nd anniversary of columbine, the truth still cries out to be heard!!!!!

TODAY, THE 22ND ANNIVERSARY OF COLUMBINE, THE TRUTH STILL CRIES OUT TO BE HEARD!!!!!

HERE WE SIT WITH 46 DEAD IN THE LAST 5 WEEKS IN MASS SHOOTINGS IN AMERICA. AND INDICATIONS & CONFIRMATIONS OF THE USE OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS IN NEARLY EVERYONE OF THOSE CASES!

To help you understand how Pharma works here is a statement from one of the five families that backed out of the lawsuit Columbine survivor Mark Taylor ended up filing alone after they were all told that if they did not win the drug maker would take everything they had.

“Coni Sanders, daughter of Dave Sanders, the slain teacher, said what happened at the Colorado high school changed everything and yet nothing.

“I feel like we have come so far in so many ways, yet we’re still stuck in the same spot,” she said. “I never imagined that we would be where we’re at right now, where there are so many mass shootings that we can’t even keep up … it’s just unfathomable that Columbine wasn’t enough.”

Society needs to wake up, join together with all the families of all these shootings & stand up & tell Pharma this has to end!

COLUMBINE VICTIM MARK TAYLOR SLAMS PHARMA BEFORE THE FDA ASKING THEM QUESTIONS LIKE:

“WHERE WERE YOU WHEN I AND MY CLASSMATES GOT SHOT?”

“AND WHY ARE WE GOING AFTER TERRORISTS WHEN PHARMA IS OUR BIGGEST TERRORIST?”

WATCH FOR ANOTHER POST WITH MARK’S STORY IN A COUPLE OF DAYS & ANNOUNCING A RADIO SHOW WITH MARK & I BEING INTERVIEWED ON THE JEFF RENSE SHOW FRIDAY NIGHT AT 7:00 PM PACIFIC TIME.

WATCH MARK’S POWERFUL FDA TESTIMONY HERE:

1999 Prophesy by a pharmacist concerned about antidepressants…

 

SCHOOL SHOOTINGS: The Evidence Antidepressants Are The Cause
Posted on October 12, 2015 by Ann Blake-Tracy | 2 Comments

Because so many are posting our database of cases of school shootings on Facebook with no explanation of the antidepressant connection, I thought I should post it here on our website as a blog so that it is easier to share with others when yet another school violence episode erupts so they too will have this information to share and educate others about the involvement of antidepressants in school shootings.

1999 PHARHARMACIST STATEMENT ON ANTIDEPRESSANTS & SCHOOL SHOOTINGS

In about 2000 I was contacted by a pharmacist who said the nicest woman in town had come regularly to get her prescription of Prozac from him until she went to prison for killing her husband. This was one message I received from him that I think the whole world needs to hear……

“The symptoms I see in patients who use/abuse serotonergic drugs of any form…could aptly be described as the “Hitler syndrome” (over-confidence in one’s own policies or decisions, no fear of consequences, criminal behavior, death of people close to the abuser as the preferred method of solving problems in the abuser’s life, coldness and lack of humanity). I feel that in twenty years or less we will be confronted not with one Hitler but with thousands or millions… numbers so great that we will be forced to interact with their distorted thinking on a daily basis. (Littleton, CO., Riverton,KS., Jonesboro, AR., eventually little Hitlers in every town in America will grow up into BIG HITLERS) It is happening right now. The most insidious factor about long-term serotonin abuse is that it enhances the individual’s persona to the point that they are able to manipulate others into their way of thinking just as Hitler did. This causes the distorted thinking, abnormal behavior, and loss of morality to spread like a contagion to otherwise normal people who have not even been exposed to the drugs. Those on the drugs are converted by the pharmacologic/physiologic processes into sociopathic demagogues.

“Do you have any comments on these thoughts, Ann? Please respond. Tell me we are not the only ones who see what is happening to our world!”

The evidence follows….

TRUTH BEHIND COLUMBINE & OTHER SCHOOL SHOOTINGS

The Truth Behind Columbine & Other School Shootings

SCHOOL & MASS SHOOTINGS: The Evidence Antidepressants Are The Cause

SCHOOL SHOOTINGS: The Evidence Antidepressants Are The Cause

Baum, Hedlund, Aristei, Guilford & Schiavo vs. Glaxo Smithkline Corporation

Baum, Hedlund, Aristei, Guilford & Schiavo vs. Glaxo Smithkline Corporation

Suit: Antidepressant is Addictive

A lawsuit contends the manufacturer of the popular anti-depressant Paxil concealed evidence that the drug can be addictive

Baum, Hedlund, Aristei, Guilford & Schiavo vs. Glaxo Smithkline Corporation

8/25/2001

Suit: Antidepressant is Addictive

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/htx/ap/20010825/us/paxil_suit_1.html

To learn more, go to http://www.baumhedlundlaw.com

A lawsuit contends the manufacturer of the popular anti-depressant Paxil concealed evidence that the drug can be addictive.

The lawsuit was filed Friday on behalf of 35 people from around the country who say they suffered symptoms ranging from electric-like shocks to suicidal thoughts after discontinuing use of the drug.

The lawsuit, which seeks class-action status and unspecified damages, says GlaxoSmithkline PLC concealed the possibility of physical and psychological withdrawal symptoms from the drug. It alleges fraud, deceit, negligence, liability, and breach of warranty.

There was no immediate comment from the British-based company. Calls to its U.S. offices after business hours Friday were not returned.

Introduced on the U.S. market in 1992, Paxil is the country’s second-largest selling anti-depressant.

Paul Domb, 42, of Miami, said that after he stopped taking Paxil last year, he suffered from convulsions, night sweats, and suicidal thoughts for about six weeks.

He said he thought the problems had to do with recent heart surgery, but after researching his symptoms he concluded they were caused by his withdrawal from Paxil.

“I stopped taking this drug … and it destroyed me. It almost killed me,” he said.

In June, a Wyoming jury awarded $8 million in damages to the family of a man after determining that Paxil caused him to kill his wife, daughter and granddaughter before committing suicide.

4/14/2000 – Safety Study Skimping?

This article appeared yesterday on the ABC News site. We know
that drugs are given only cursory tests before being introduced
into the marketplace. Pharmaceuticals counter that they do
extensive follow-up testing (post-marketing) to assure that the
drugs are in fact safe. Now, it appears that this is something to
which they only give lip service. Mark

http://abcnews.go.com/onair/WorldNewsTonight/wnt_000413_fd
a_feature.html

Report Says Drug Companies Fail to Complete Required Tests
When the Food and Drug Administration approves a drug it may
still have lingering questions about its safety or effectiveness
which it expects will be answered by the drug company.
(ABCNEWS.com)

By John McKenzie

N E W Y O R K, April 13 Evidence gathered by an
independent advocacy group suggests that many drug
companies in the United States are not keeping all of their
promises.

When a drug is approved by the Food and Drug Administration,
pharmaceutical firms are required to fulfill “post-marketing”
commitments to continue studying the safety and effectiveness
of the new product. Such research is necessary because the
FDA often approves drugs that have been tested on only a few
thousand people and lingering questions may remain about
how the drugs interact with other medicines or foods and what
kinds of side effects they may create in various patients.

The new study indicates, however, that many companies
routinely fail to follow through with these studies after the new
drugs reach the market. And the FDA is virtually powerless to do
anything about their lack of compliance.

The group that issued the report, Public Citizen, presented the
evidence to the FDA today, based on information obtained
through the Freedom of Information Act.

“Reliance on post-marketing studies as a way of safely
approving drugs is a dumb idea,” says Dr. Sidney Wolfe of Public
Citizen. “And a very dangerous idea because the studies mainly
are not getting done.”

Non-Compliance, No Consequences

According to Wolfe and the other authors of the report, FDA files
reveal that five drugs that were approved in the past decade and
later withdrawn from the market for safety reasons never had all
of their required follow-up studies completed.

And as of last December, only 11 out of the 88 new drugs that
were approved with post-marketing commitments between 1990
and 1994, had been subjected to the necessary studies or
properly filed the results. That€ ‘²s a compliance rate of just 13
percent.

“Five to ten years is certainly more than enough for the
overwhelming majority of these studies to be completed,” says
Dr. Brian Strom of the University of Pennsylvania. “The longer it
takes to answer these questions the longer patients are
exposed to potentially unnecessary risks.”

FDA Lacks Power

Representatives for the drug industry, however, say such studies
require greater patience.

“Specific studies that have to be designed, executed’. and if
they’re done in a comprehensive way they take a long time
to
do,” says Wayne Pines, a pharmaceutical industry spokesman.

But while the FDA can tell the drug companies to conduct
additional post-marketing studies, the fact is that once a drug is
on the market there’s little it can do to enforce the order.

Consumer advocates say Congress needs to give the FDA the
authority to impose fines on drug companies that break their
promises.